Abstract

A comparison of amodiaquine and chloroquine in the treatment therapy of falciparum malaria in Kenya

Nevill CG, Verhoeff FH, Munafu CG, ten Hove WR, van der Kaay HJ, Were JB
East Afr Med J. 1994;71

Permenent descriptor

During June to August 1989, 158 symptomatic outpatients with P. falciparum malaria were randomly treated with either amodiaquine or chloroquine 25 mg/kg, divided over three days. Amodiaquine (Camoquin, Parke-Davis) was significantly more effective in terms of the rate of parasite clearance, 2.4 versus 3.1 days; parasite clearance day 7; 87% versus 41%; and clinical amelioration, 98% versus 68%. Moreover, this study demonstrates the lack of therapeutic toxicity of amodiaquine. Globally, tolerance was better with amodiaquine than with chloroquine; in particular, cutaneous side effects were less frequent with amodiaquine. There was no evidence of granulocyte or gross hepatic toxicity. These results suggest that WHO recommendations concerning amodiaquine should be questioned. In view of its low cost, demonstrated efficacy and lack of proven therapeutic toxicity, amodiaquine should be considered as a viable replacement for chloroquine in areas with high levels of clinical chloroquine failure.